Home / Technology / Cases / Comparative Analysis of Sludge Dewatering Equipment: Screw Press, Plate and Frame Filter Press, Belt Filter Press, and Centrifugal Dewatering Machine

Comparative Analysis of Sludge Dewatering Equipment: Screw Press, Plate and Frame Filter Press, Belt Filter Press, and Centrifugal Dewatering Machine

By: Kate Chen
Email: [email protected]
Date: May 20th, 2025

This technical comparison evaluates four common sludge dewatering technologies - screw press, plate and frame filter press, belt filter press, and centrifugal dewatering machine - across critical operational parameters including working principles, performance characteristics, and application suitability.  

1. Operating Principles  
- Screw Press: Utilizes the relative motion between rotating screw shafts and alternating movable/fixed ring plates to achieve dewatering through progressive mechanical compression.  
- Plate and Frame Filter Press: Implements high-pressure filtration through plate compression, forcing water separation via filter cloths.  
- Belt Filter Press: Combines gravitational drainage with progressive roller pressure between two continuous filter belts.  
- Centrifugal Dewatering: Separates solid-liquid phases through high-speed rotational centrifugation (typically 2,000-4,000 rpm).  

2. Performance Metrics  

Requires ancillary thickening tank  
Frequent filter cloth replacement (200-500 cycles)  

3. Technical Advantages  

- Screw Press: Space-efficient configuration, CIP-compatible design, minimal polymer requirement  
- Plate and Frame: Superior cake dryness, effective for high-solids feeds  
- Belt Press: Balanced capital-operating costs, adaptable to variable sludge rheology  
- Centrifugal: High throughput consistency, effective for abrasive materials  


4. Operational Constraints  

- Screw Press: Limited capacity scaling, sensitivity to fibrous particulates  
- Plate and Frame: Extended cycle times (4-8 hr/batch), labor-intensive operation  
- Belt Press: Frequent belt alignment requirements (Q8h inspection), washwater consumption  
- Centrifugal: High NVH levels , significant wear part costs  


5. Applicable Scenarios

- Screw Press: Suitable for small-to-medium scale wastewater treatment plants, food processing industries, and oily sludge treatment applications.
- Plate and Frame Filter Press: Recommended for large-scale wastewater treatment facilities and in organic sludge processing operations.
- Belt Filter Press: Ideal for medium-to-large municipal wastewater treatment plants and municipal sludge dewatering requirements.
- Centrifugal Dewatering Machine: Optimized for high-capacity industrial wastewater treatment systems and industrial sludge separation processes.

6. Technical Advantages
- Screw Press: Compact structural design, advanced automation integration, and minimized maintenance expenditure.
- Plate and Frame Filter Press: Achieves ultra-low moisture cake content (DS ≥ 35%) with reduced flocculant dosage (typically 0.1-0.3% dry solids).
- Belt Filter Press: Delivers stable dewatering performance, energy-efficient operation (specific energy ≤ 15 kWh/t DS), and simplified operational protocols.
- Centrifugal Dewatering Machine: High-throughput capacity (up to 50 m³/hr), fully automated control systems, and competitive operational expenditure (OPEX).

This comparative analysis provides essential guidance for sludge dewatering system selection based on plant-specific operational requirements, sludge characteristics (e.g., VS content, particle size distribution), and total cost of ownership considerations. Proper pilot testing (≥30 days) remains critical for technology validation with actual process streams.

Contact Us

*We respect your confidentiality and all information are protected.

×
Password
Get password
Enter password to download relevant content.
Submit
submit
Please send us a message